Printer-friendly version
Opponents say change was made without public input
By Miriam Raftery
March 13, 2014 (San Francisco)--Today, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) voted unanimously on its plan to replace power from the shut-down San Onofre Nuclear Generating System. The plan will require Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric to incorporate clean energy to replace the San Onofre system. But environmentalistssay that last minute changes in the final decision raise the odds that utilities will build gas plants instead of local, renewable energy sources.
According to the California Air Resources Board, greenhouse gas emissions rose in 2012 for the first time since 2008 because of increased reliance on gas plants after San Onofre closed.
While the CPUC’s final plan does require that a portion of the energy come from renewable sources, the utilities will ultimately get to choose where the bulk of the energy comes from, which could include natural gas. Leaving this choice in the hands of utilities could pave the way for new, gas-fired power plants that are often built in low-income communities.
In San Diego County, San Diego Gas & Electric has already begun to lay the groundwork for a new gas plant in Carlsbad. The utility could use that plant in the energy mix required by the CPUC to replace the San Onofre plant.
“The closure of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station opened the way to pursue clean energy options in Southern California. While the utilities will be required to replace at least some of the power with preferred renewable resources, the Commission has also authorized building more energy capacity than is necessary,” said Will Rostov, Earthjustice Staff Attorney, who represented Sierra Club in the proceeding. “Additionally, there were some last minute changes to the decision that appear to facilitate the opening of new gas-powered power plants, a clear step in the wrong direction when we’re striving to build more clean energy resources and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.”
Strela Cervas, Co-Coordinator with the California Earth Justice Alliance, said,“We are outraged at this decision. The CPUC is allowing far too much new energy generation that we don’t need. What is especially concerning is that it leaves the door wide open for the vast majority of that energy to be produced with polluting fossil fuels, at the expense of our wallets and our health. These dirty gas plants are likely to end up in low-income communities of color who have been clamoring for local clean energy. This decision completely circumvents the public’s input.”
Evan Gillespie is the Campaign Director for My Generation. “The CPUC’s final plan is a major step back the Governor’s already-weak proposal, which would have required at least half the power come from renewable resources,” he said. “The Administration had a chance to support local, clean energy innovation and instead chose more pollution by allowing dirty gas to play a majority role in replacing San Onofre. Now, they are leaving the fate of Southern California’s energy future in the hands of the utilities, giving them the power to choose between dirty gas or clean energy. Moving forward, we expect the utilities do the right thing and side with their customers who want clean energy that will protect their air and health.”
Existing gas plants are already contributing to the ozone pollution that leaves the Los Angeles basin with some of the dirtiest air in the country, with an "F" rating from the American Lung Association. Residents of affected communities have held a series of escalating protests and actions in recent months, demanding that the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station be replaced with clean energy and jobs, not more dirty gas-fired plants.
New gas plants would lock in more carbon pollution for decades to come and would undermine California’s climate targets.
Recent comments