Printer-friendly version
By Ken Stone, Times of San Diego, a member of the San Diego Online News Association
Photo: Rep. Darrell Issa at Gold Star Family hearing last August in Escondido. Photo by Chris Stone
December 14, 2023 (Washington, D.C.) - The House of Representatives voted Wednesday to formally authorize its ongoing impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden as Republicans unite behind the effort even though they have yet to find evidence of wrongdoing by the Democrat.
Rep. Darrell Issa of East County was part of the 221-212 party line vote to approve the probe, which is examining whether Biden improperly benefited from his 53-year-old son Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings.
Hours earlier, the younger Biden refused a call to testify behind closed doors.
“What a dishonest performance by Hunter Biden today — Lois Lerner would have been proud,” Issa posted on X, echoing his long-running calls for an impeachment probe.
(In 2013, Lerner was an IRS official who apologized that Tea Party groups and other groups had been targeted for audits of their applications for tax exemption. She later resigned amid an uproar.)
The rest of the San Diego County delegation — Democratic Reps. Sara Jacobs, Mike Levin, Scott Peters and Juan Vargas — voted no on the impeachment inquiry.
After the vote, Levin tweeted that he was disappointed to see “extreme MAGA Republicans are once again pushing baseless impeachment threats rather than supporting American families.”
The White House has dismissed the inquiry as unsubstantiated by facts and politically motivated. Biden is preparing for a possible 2024 election rematch with his Republican predecessor, Donald Trump. Trump is the first president in U.S. history to be impeached twice and is currently preparing for four upcoming criminal trials.
The effort will almost certainly fail to remove Biden from office. Even if the House votes to impeach the president, the Senate would then have to vote to convict him on the charges by a two-thirds vote — a near-impossibility in a chamber where Biden’s fellow Democrats hold a 51-49 majority.
But it could help Republicans highlight their allegations of corruption through much of the 2024 campaign.
The vote comes three months after Republicans informally began the probe and is not a required step to remove a president or other official from office.
However, authorization could give Republicans more legal authority to force Biden’s administration to cooperate and could help to counter accusations from Democrats who say it lacks legitimacy.
House Republicans allege that Biden and his family profited from his actions when he served as President Barack Obama’s vice president from 2009 to 2017 and they have zeroed in on his son’s business ventures in Ukraine and China during that period.
They have turned up evidence that the younger Biden led clients to believe that he could provide access to the vice president’s office. But they have not provided evidence that Biden took any official actions to help those businesses or benefited financially from them.
Biden in a statement chastised House Republicans for not acting on his request for any of his domestic priorities or providing emergency funding for Ukraine and Israel.
“House Republicans are not joining me. Instead of doing anything to help make Americans’ lives better, they are focused on attacking me with lies,” Biden said.
‘No Evidence’
On Monday, Hunter Biden defied a committee subpoena to testify behind closed doors — saying he would testify only in public as he feared his words would otherwise be misrepresented.
“There is no evidence to support the allegations that my father was financially involved in my business, because it did not happen,” Hunter Biden said.
Members of the committee said they would take steps to hold him in contempt of Congress, which could potentially result in prison time.
“The House has now spoken, and I think pretty loudly, pretty clearly with every single Republican voting in favor of moving into this official impeachment inquiry phase of our constitutional duty to do oversight,” said Republican Rep. Jim Jordan.
House Republicans from districts Biden won in 2020 said they viewed the inquiry as a fact-finding exercise.
"The whole point of an inquiry is not to pre-judge,” said Rep. Nick LaLota of New York.
“The average New Yorker is mighty suspicious of folks from the president’s family making tens of millions of dollars in professions in which they had no experience — seems a little fuzzy,” LaLota said, referring to Hunter Biden’s prior role on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma.
Trump, the frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination, was impeached twice by the House during his presidency: in 2020 for trying to pressure Ukraine to announce a corruption investigation of Biden, and in 2021 for trying to overturn his election loss.
Both attempts foundered in the Senate.
Hunter Biden, who has described his struggles with drug and alcohol addiction, has also been the subject of a years-long criminal investigation.
He faces federal charges that he lied about his drug use while buying a handgun and separate charges of failing to pay $1.4 million in taxes. He has pleaded not guilty to the gun charges, and his lawyer says he has repaid his taxes in full.
“In the depths of my addiction, I was extremely irresponsible with my finances. But to suggest that is grounds for an impeachment inquiry is beyond the absurd. It’s shameless,” he said.
Reuters contributed to this report.
Recent comments