HOW THE INTERNATIONAL MEDIA IS COVERING TRUMP INDICTMENT NEWS

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version Share this

By Jacob Pamus

June 12, 2023 (San Diego) -- Former president Donald Trump’s second indictment, this time by federal prosecutors who allege that he compromised national security by mishandling classifeid documents,  is big news around the world.  Here’s a sampling of how the international press is covering the story.

In Britain, a BBC news report titled, What's in the Trump indictment: US nuclear secrets and files kept in shower explains the documents that Trump kept contained Nuclear weapons information and other important military secrets. BBC reported that Trump will be appearing in court on Tuesday, June 13th. Trump has been denying these accusations on Truth Social.

Reuters, the major French newspaper, ran a story headlined, Trump risked national secrets, prosecutors allege in indictment.  The article mentions that two of Trumps lawyers, John Rowley and Jim Trusty quit the case.  It also details allegations that Trump pressured two of his other lawyers to lie and falsely state that he had no classified materials.

Al Jazeera , the major news source in the Middle East, published an article on June 9 titled, No one is above the law: reactions to Trump indictment: This article quotes Jack Smith, special counsel in the US Justice department who is leading the indictment, stating, “We have one set of laws in this country, and they apply to everyone. Applying those laws, collecting facts – that’s what determines the outcome of an investigation, nothing more, nothing less.” AlJazeera also quoted a tweet posted by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, defending Trump even though DeSantis is running against Trump in 2024 presidential election.

Kevin McCarthy, Republican Speaker of the House was also featured in the article, stating, “Joe Biden kept classified documents for decades. I, and every American who believes in the rule of law, stand with President Trump against this grave injustice. House Republicans will hold this brazen weaponization of power accountable.” McCarthy made this statement on Thursday on June 8th, 2023 before the indictment was released.

Business Insider, a global business news source, has run numerous stories such as Indictment alleges Trump hoarded classified documents on 'vulnerabilities of the United States and its allies to military attack.'  The article opened by stating that “Donald Trump, who as the GOP presidential nominee pledged to follow and "enforce" procedures to protect America's secrets, had some extremely damaging ones allegedly laying around his estate and private club, according to federal prosecutors.”

The article voiced concerns over documents with nuclear secrets of the U.S.and other countries, concluding, "US security and that of the NATO alliance is underpinned by its massive nuclear arsenal, with grave concerns that information about individual weapons or plans could prove a windfall for American adversaries or terror groups looking to steal a weapon."

 


Error message

Support community news in the public interest! As nonprofit news, we rely on donations from the public to fund our reporting -- not special interests. Please donate to sustain East County Magazine's local reporting and/or wildfire alerts at https://www.eastcountymedia.org/donate to help us keep people safe and informed across our region.

Comments

More double standards by the Editor

Many times over the years I've seen posters being banned on this site for not abiding by the "rules" of civil engagement, and for posting derogatory remarks. As witnessed here, yet another example of the double standards and the rules not being applied in a nonpartisan manner. How many warnings does "santeecitizen" get, Miriam?

Santee Citizens' post has been removed

for inappropriate language.  I tried emailing but his email bounced.  Santee Citizen, if you read this, please contact me at editor@eastcountymagazine.org.  If we see another post that violates our site rules,we'll be cancelling your posting privileges. 

Please refrain from profanity, crude language, and personal insults directed at other readers. Be respectful even if you disagree.

 

Way to keep it classy Santeecitizen

I would say that your ad homiem attack demonstrates your lack of fairness and basic logic.

You have been blinded by your hate.

We have a two-tier justice system

And a two-tier media coverage system to go along with it. ECM never misses an opportunity to highlight any negative coverage of DJT, but NEVER reports on anything negative relating to the Biden Family, or administration. Your one-sided reporting is shameful, this is nothing more than a propaganda site. Senator Chuck Grassley on the latest info regarding the FBI coverup: “The foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe & Hunter Biden allegedly has audio recordings of his conversation[s], 17 such recordings. According to the 1023, the foreign national possesses 15 audio recordings of phone calls between him & Hunter Biden [and] two audio recordings of phone calls between him & then-VP Biden. These recordings were allegedly kept as a sort of insurance policy for the foreign national in case that he got into a tight spot. The 1023 also indicates that then-vice President Joe Biden may have been involved in Burisma employing Hunter Biden. Based on the facts known to the Congress & the public, it’s clear that DoJ, the FBI haven’t nearly had the same laser focus on the Biden family.” More here : Biden Corruption

Grassley's claims about Biden

were published on his website after our story was posted, so we hadn't seen them.  However his allegations are too vague at this point- he fails to name this shadowy so-called "source."

If solid evidence emerges that Biden took a bribe,  or if  he is charged with a crime, we would report that even-handedly.  Just as we've reported even-handedly on political scandals that ended the careers of several local politicians, including Democrats Bob Filner and Nathan Fletcher, as well as Republican Duncan D. Hunter. Two of those cases resulted in criminal cases and another in a civil suit still in court. Those had solid documentation of who was making the accusations. We are not a tabloid,  and don't report on mere rumors by unattributed sources.

I disagree

You ran stories non-stop about "Russian Collusion" leading up to the last election, which turned out to be a complete fabrication and one you've never acknowledged. There have been credible stories about corruption within the Biden administration swirling around for months now, yet you've neglected to cover those. I'm no Trump fan and vote as an Independent, but your partisan coverage on this site is hard to ignore. Be better.

As for election rigging,

I've won a national journalism award in the past for exposing voting machine hacking issues that led California's Secretary of State to remove some vulnerable voting machines. Not all aspects of the Russian Collusion have been disproved though the Steele dossier is suspect, I agree. But what remains of concern is the fact that authorities have confirmed that Russia tried to hack into multiple states' voting machiens here,and did penetrate at least two systems, though there's no evidence that they succeeded in changing votes.

Why would Russia want to do that? We know that Russia backed Donald Trump, and that Trump has been too cozy with Putin for comfort - praising the dictator, and even Putin's invasion of Ukraine. Why did Putin want Trump to win so badly? Trump was trying to build a hotel in Moscow at the time. Were there promises made by Trump? And why did Trump want to keep documents he wasn't entitled to have after his presidency, including our nation's deepest nuclear secrets?  We don't yet know who else Trump may have shown national security secrets to,and that's troubling.

As for the Biden/bribery claims made by two Republican Congressional members based on an unnamed source,  theWashington Post investigated and found this lacked credilbity: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/06/13/gop-biden-allegation-...

 

russia. russia. russia.

I never mentioned election rigging, that’s a whole other topic. As for the awards…congratulations, but I don’t pay too much attention to awards since Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize. Labeling the Steele dossier as “suspect” is akin to surmising that the Holocaust was a “possibility”. Worse yet, it was a plan hatched by the outgoing president, his hopeful replacement, and the director of the CIA among others. More than half this country no longer have any faith in our elections, our judicial system, our FBI/CIA, our Government and most of all, our news coverage. The dissatisfaction with the MSM has never been higher, and that distrust is a direct result of the one-sided coverage I’ve mentioned above. I find it ironic when you mention why Putin would consider it in his best interest to have Trump rather than Clinton/Biden in the Oval Office. One only has to look at the current situation in Ukraine and the proxy war we’re fighting there to understand that. Trump isn’t a war monger, both the others are. I also find it ironic that you’re so quick to dismiss the claims made by Senator Grassley and label the whistleblower as a “shadowy so-called source” which is a 180º turnaround from how you characterized all of the false claims made about Trump leading up to the past two elections, or the non-stop claims of "plenty of evidence" made by Adam Schiff. Double standards much? I’m not here to defend Trump, and I have no doubt the current charges will turn out to be a big nothing burger if the past is any predictor of the future. Just another attempt by the Deep State to try and keep him from taking office again. If we’re going to care about secret documents Trump had at Mar-a-Lago, then we should equally care about secret documents Biden had in his garage next to his corvette. That won’t happen though, reasons mentioned above.